| 引用本文: | 赵银兵,倪忠云,欧阳渊,袁材栋,陈馨熠,王东,刘晶晶,刘洪.生态地质环境承载力研究进展[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2022,42(4):529-541.[点击复制] |
| | [点击复制] |
|
| |
|
|
| 本文已被：浏览 204次 下载 154次 |
码上扫一扫！ |
| 生态地质环境承载力研究进展 |
| 赵银兵,倪忠云,欧阳渊,袁材栋,陈馨熠,王东,刘晶晶,刘洪 |
|
|
| (成都理工大学 旅游与城乡规划学院, 四川 成都 610059;成都理工大学 地球科学学院, 四川 成都 610059;河北省湿地生态与保护重点实验室(筹), 河北 衡水 053000;中国地质调查局成都地质调查中心, 四川 成都 610081;青海省环境地质勘查局地质环境调查院, 青海 西宁 810007;成都理工大学 地球科学学院, 四川 成都 610059;中国地质调查局成都地质调查中心, 四川 成都 610081) |
|
| 摘要: |
| 生态地质环境从生态地质学和环境地质学发展而来，由地质环境、生态环境和社会经济环境三个子系统构成一个有机整体，它与环境类承载力结合形成生态地质环境承载力，表征环境能够承受的人类活动阈限。国内的生态地质环境承载力研究分为2000年以前的准备阶段、2000-2010年探索前进阶段、2011年至今的稳定发展阶段，国家重大方针政策实施和重大生态地质环境事件影响了承载力的研究方向。生态地质环境子系统和系统的承载力发展程度存在差异，生态环境承载力研究较多、地质环境承载力研究次之、社会经济环境承载力研究相对较少，系统承载力研究处于不断整合之中。已有研究在学科交叉融合、耦合机制、模拟预测模型集成和国家重大需求服务响应等方面存在不足。未来生态地质环境承载力研究应坚持系统观，统合子系统和系统两个尺度，从拓展学科纵深关联、深化多维耦合机制、发展集成模拟预测模型、面向国家与社会需求等方面将研究推向新高度。 |
| 关键词: 生态地质环境 承载力 耦合机制 模型集成 情景模拟 |
| DOI：10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2022.04021 |
| 附件 |
| 投稿时间：2022-02-17修订日期：2022-04-05 |
| 基金项目:中国地质调查项目(DD20190542)；四川省科学技术厅软科学项目(22RKX0490)；四川省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地青藏高原及其东缘人文地理研究中心开放课题(RWDL2021-ZD002)；河北省湿地生态与保护重点实验室(筹)开放基金(hklk201902) |
|
| Research progress of eco-geological environment carrying capacity |
| ZHAO Yinbing,NI Zhongyun,OUYANG Yuan,YUAN Caidong,CHEN Xinyi,WANG Dong,LIU Jingjing,LIU Hong |
| (College of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;College of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Protection of Hebei Province (under preparation), Hengshui 053000, China;Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610081, China;Geological Environment Investigation Institute of Qinghai Environmental Geological Exploration Bureau, Xining 810007, China;College of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China;Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610081, China) |
| Abstract: |
| Eco-geological environment is developed from ecological geology and environmental geology, and constitutes an organic whole by three subsystems of geological environment, ecological environment and social and economic environment. It is combined with the carrying capacity of environment to form the carrying capacity of eco-geological environment, which is used to characterize the threshold of human activities that can be tolerated. Domestic research on eco-geological environment carrying capacity can be divided into three stages: the preparation stage before 2000, the exploration stage from 2000 to 2010, and the stable development stage from 2011 to the present. The implementation of major national guidelines and policies and major eco-geological environmental events have affected the research direction of carrying capacity. There is a certain difference between the development degree of the carrying capacity of eco-geological environment subsystems and systems. There are more studies on the carrying capacity of ecological environment, followed by the carrying capacity of geological environment, and the carrying capacity of social and economic environment is the last. During the same period, research on the carrying capacity of system is in the process of continuous integration. Existing research has deficiencies in terms of interdisciplinary integration, coupling mechanism, integration of simulation and forecasting models, and response to major national demand services. In the future, the research on the carrying capacity of eco-geological environment should adhere to the system view, integrate the two scales of subsystem and system, and push the research to a new height from the aspects of expanding the in-depth correlation of disciplines, deepening the multi-dimensional coupling mechanism, developing integrated simulation and prediction model, and responding to the needs of the state and society. |
| Key words: eco-geological environment carrying capacity coupling mechanism model integration scenario simulation |
|
|
|
|
|